Education Next is a conservative journal that can be counted on to support education reform in all its manifestations.
However, today it is releasing a new study finding that the most ineffective way to rate teacher education programs is by the test scores of students taught by their graduates. As we have often said, VAM (value-added measurement), beloved by Arne Duncan, is a sham. The now discredited rule was promulgated by the Obama administration.
Ranking teacher-prep programs on value-added is ineffective
New analysis finds program rankings based on graduates’ value-added scores are largely random
Last year Congress repealed a federal rule that would have required states to rank teacher-preparation programs according to their graduates’ impact on student test scores. Yet twenty-one states and D.C. still choose to rank programs in this way. Can student test performance reliably identify more and less effective teacher-preparation programs? In a new article for Education…
View original post 400 more words